----- Original Message ----- From: "Cory T. Tusar" ctusar@videon-central.com To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: peter.pearse@arm.com Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 10:05 PM Subject: [U-Boot-Users] arm920t RAM relocation broken?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Commit d4fc6012 added an #ifdef CONFIG_AT91RM9200 construct around the RAM relocation bits in cpu/arm920t/start.S. More directly, it added an entire secondary relocation snippet surrounded by an #ifdef CONFIG_BOOTBINFUNC construct.
It appears that this second implementation was later removed in commit 80767a6c, but the #ifdef CONFIG_AT91RM9200 logic was not removed also.
Is RAM relocation only intended to function on at91rm9200 boards, or shall I submit a patch fixing the above?
- -Cory
Does this mean that the AT91RM9200 always relocates? Then the code is simply wrong.
If you run from a serial flash, then the code is already relocated and is executing from SDRAM at this point, so the code will crash.
Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson