On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Otavio Salvador otavio@ossystems.com.br wrote:
#define PAD_CTL_HYS (1 << 16) +#define PAD_CTL_LVE (1 << 17) +#define PAD_CTL_LVE_BIT (1 << 22)
This conflicts with:
#define NO_PAD_CTRL (1 << 17)
Correct, I missed the NO_PAD_CTRL definition.
I have changed the MASK as:
-#define MUX_PAD_CTRL_MASK ((iomux_v3_cfg_t)0x3ffff << MUX_PAD_CTRL_SHIFT) +#define MUX_PAD_CTRL_MASK ((iomux_v3_cfg_t)0x43ffff << MUX_PAD_CTRL_SHIFT)
and seems to work fine. Do you see any issue?
Changing this mask will alter the layout of the bitfield definitions and will affect the other fields:
* * IOMUX/PAD Bit field definitions * * MUX_CTRL_OFS: 0..11 (12) * PAD_CTRL_OFS: 12..23 (12) * SEL_INPUT_OFS: 24..35 (12) * MUX_MODE + SION: 36..40 (5) * PAD_CTRL + NO_PAD_CTRL: 41..58 (18) * SEL_INP: 59..62 (4) * reserved: 63 (1) */