-----Original Message----- From: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 5:49 PM To: Prabhakar Kushwaha prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] travis.yml: Add buildman support for NXP's LS1028 & LX2160
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:47:12PM +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
NXP's LS1028 and LX2160 platform build support added via buildman in travis.yml.
Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com
.travis.yml | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml index 8bd49ef1a5..e4e7e653f6 100644 --- a/.travis.yml +++ b/.travis.yml @@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ matrix: - name: "buildman NXP AArch64 LS101x" env: - BUILDMAN="freescale&aarch64&ls101"
- name: "buildman NXP AArch64 LS102x"
env:- BUILDMAN="freescale&aarch64&ls102"
- name: "buildman NXP AArch64 LS104x" env:
- BUILDMAN="freescale&aarch64&ls104"
@@ -192,6 +195,9 @@ matrix: - name: "buildman NXP AArch64 LS20xx" env: - BUILDMAN="freescale&aarch64&&ls20"
- name: "buildman NXP AArch64 LX216x"
env:- BUILDMAN="freescale&aarch64&lx216"
- name: "buildman i.MX6 (non-NXP)" env:
- BUILDMAN="mx6 -x freescale,toradex,boundary,engicam"
Are you sure the current jobs don't catch these? I thought I checked for everything when I split it up.
LX2 and LS1028A are new SoC added recently. But they are not getting build as part of default .travis.yml. This patch fix it. .
And on a related note, I look forward to switching to gitlab CI where we control the job timeout and can stop splitting things up so much.
Is there any timeline about this transition.
--pk