
1 Jun
2017
1 Jun
'17
6:27 p.m.
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Jonathan Gray jsg@jsg.id.au wrote:
Comment was intended to be mx6d/mx6q?
Though the test here may not be needed as setup_sata() returns early if not available. And mx6cuboxi.c wouldn't need to be updated here if a i.MX 6DualPlus or i.MX 6QuadPlus board from SolidRun shows up at some point in the future.
u-boot/arch/arm/imx-common/sata.c
int setup_sata(void) { struct iomuxc *const iomuxc_regs = (struct iomuxc *)IOMUXC_BASE_ADDR; int ret;
if (!is_mx6dq() && !is_mx6dqp()) return 1;
Good points!
Peter, please send a v2 taking into account Jonathan's comments. Thanks