Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 13:47:20 schrieb Joe Hershberger:
Hi Lars,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Joe Hershberger
joe.hershberger@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lars,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Joe Hershberger
joe.hershberger@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lars,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Lars Poeschel poeschel@lemonage.de
wrote:
Hi Joe,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:03:59AM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> I beat you to it: > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-May/214261.html%3E%3E%3E%3E > Well, ... ok. You won ;-) Your patchset is by far more comprehensive than mine. If I see this right in the archives, you did not receive any comments since nearly a month.
That is true. I really would like a little feedback on it... or maybe I can just drop the controversial one and only include these things... they seem to be mostly straightforward.
This was RFC will you resend this as a "real" PATCH ?
Yes.
Could you then include two of the dependencies from my patches: I think CMD_UBI has to depend on MTD_PARTITIONS and obivously CMD_UBIFS
I noticed when adding MTD_PARTITIONS that MTD_DEVICE is not moved over yet. Do you know what the dependency relationship is there? If not I'll dig into it a bit.
Sorry, I am really not sure about this. I think in my configuration MTD_PARTITIONS worked even without MTD_DEVICE. But maybe looking into drivers/mtd/Makefile:8 helps here. It seems that MTD_PARTITIONS needs either MTD_DEVICE, CMD_NAND, CMD_ONENAND or CMD_SF.
Lars