4 Feb
2014
4 Feb
'14
9:46 p.m.
On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 13:43 +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Scott and others,
I have a question regarding BBT position and number of blocks allocated for BBT.
Did you face the issue with last 4 blocks broken in any NAND flash device since the default option in Linux/u-boot BBM is last 4 blocks?
It doesn't mean that if the last 4 blocks are broken than the NAND flash device is broken too. Also I haven't seen any common binding for Linux kernel to change it.
Has someone tried to improve this algorithm or process of storing BBT in a better way. For example just look for BBT from the end till any limit?
I don't recall if I've ever tested it personally, but that sort of scanning is already there. Have you seen a problem with it?
-Scott