In message 87achfykq2.wl%konsti@ku-gbr.de you wrote:
Ouch! I will fix this. I even found linebreaks replaced by TAB+linebreak.
Does that mean that I should ignore the link you posted earlier today?
Do you have seen this by accident or do you search for such things with your editor?
I scan most patches, escpecially from new or untrusted posters, and I regularly scan (and cleanup) the whole code tree.
scb9328.h file don't look clean to me. Your definition of CONFIG_COMMANDS is error prone.
Ok, how should I do it right?
Make sure to include or exactly the needed features only. "all but X" is asking for problems when a new feature Y gets added which is not supported by your board. Rather use "default - M - N + X + Y".
I don't get it. May be I have blinders on now. But how breaks a new config command my setup (and not the others, I saw this construction somewhere else).
Yes, there are several of these stupidly configured boards which I have to cleanup nearly each time a new command gets added. See above.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk