Hi JJ,
On 05/11/19 5:20 PM, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
This will probe the multiplexer devices that have a "u-boot,mux-autoprobe" property. As a consequence they will be put in their idle state.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot jjhiblot@ti.com
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/mux/mux-uclass.c b/drivers/mux/mux-uclass.c index 6aaf4dc964..71392e9e50 100644 --- a/drivers/mux/mux-uclass.c +++ b/drivers/mux/mux-uclass.c @@ -262,6 +262,28 @@ int mux_uclass_post_probe(struct udevice *dev) return 0; }
+void dm_mux_init(void) +{
- struct uclass *uc;
- struct udevice *dev;
- int ret;
- ret = uclass_get(UCLASS_MUX, &uc);
- if (ret < 0) {
debug("unable to get MUX uclass\n");return;- }
- uclass_foreach_dev(dev, uc) {
if (dev_read_bool(dev, "u-boot,mux-autoprobe")) {ret = device_probe(dev);if (ret)debug("unable to probe device %s\n", dev->name);} else {printf("not found for dev %s\n", dev->name);}
Is "u-boot,mux-autoprobe" a required property? The fact that its in DT makes me think its optional. If that's the case, above printf() should be reduced to debug() to avoid confusion
- }
+}
UCLASS_DRIVER(mux) = { .id = UCLASS_MUX, .name = "mux", diff --git a/include/mux.h b/include/mux.h index 060f71a47c..2467723951 100644 --- a/include/mux.h +++ b/include/mux.h @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ void mux_control_put(struct mux_control *mux);
struct mux_control *devm_mux_control_get(struct udevice *dev, const char *mux_name); +void dm_mux_init(void);
#else unsigned int mux_control_states(struct mux_control *mux) {