
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 11:16:28AM +0200, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
On 7 May 2018, at 04:34, Marty E. Plummer hanetzer@startmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 10:20:55AM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
Hi Marty,
On 05/06/2018 10:25 PM, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c
Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.
I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.
Signed-off-by: Marty E. Plummer hanetzer@startmail.com
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ #include <asm/io.h> #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h> #include <dm/uclass-internal.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) @@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) size_t size_mb = 0; u32 ch;
- u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
- u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
& SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
- if (!size_mb) {
I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it? I think don't need the changes before here.
Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb) guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.
/*
* we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
* since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
* so we reserve it
*/
size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);
This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE instead of hard code.
Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed, build and boot tested on my hardware.
In that case you just masked the problem but didn???t solve it: assuming size_mb is size_t (I???ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 ) which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.
In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out???).
A very valid point. With the following patch to sdram_common.c and sdram_rk3288.c applied I get the debug output that follows it: diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c index 232a7fa655..0fe69bf558 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
+#define DEBUG 1 #include <common.h> #include <dm.h> #include <ram.h> @@ -39,16 +40,19 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20)); + debug("%s: %d: chipsize_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, chipsize_mb);
if (rank > 1) chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row); if (row_3_4) chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4; size_mb += chipsize_mb; + debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb); debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n", rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4); }
+ debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb); size_mb = min(size_mb, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE/SZ_1M);
return (size_t)size_mb << 20; diff --git a/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c b/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c index d99bf12476..9738eb088f 100644 --- a/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c +++ b/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ * Adapted from coreboot. */
+#define DEBUG 1 #include <common.h> #include <clk.h> #include <dm.h>
--- U-Boot SPL 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500) Trying to boot from SPI
U-Boot 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)
Model: Google Speedy DRAM: rockchip_sdram_size ff73009c 3c50dc50 rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400 rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 800 rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0 rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400 rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 1000 rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0 rockchip_sdram_size: 54: size_mb 1000 SDRAM base=0, size=fe000000 4 GiB MMC: dwmmc@ff0c0000: 1, dwmmc@ff0d0000: 2, dwmmc@ff0f0000: 0 In: cros-ec-keyb Out: vidconsole Err: vidconsole Model: Google Speedy rockchip_dnl_key_pressed: adc_channel_single_shot fail! Net: Net Initialization Skipped No ethernet found. Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 I guess we need to change the size_t to something larger; unless I'm mistaken, that's a 32 bit value, right? and 0x100000000 is at least 40 bits, unless I'm missing the issue here somewhere. However, that would take a change to include/ram.h, and would impact far more than just rk3288/rockchip devices across the board, so I'm unsure how to proceed.
Use the min macro here for now, and begin work migrating the ram_info size member to a 64-bit container?
Thanks,
- Kever
}
return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de mailto:U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot