Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 8/8] binman_sym: guard with CONFIG_SPL_BINMAN_SYMBOLS
On 20/05/2022 17:10, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
From: Peng Fan peng.fan@nxp.com
There is case that CONFIG_BINMAN is defined, but CONFIG_SPL_BINMAN_SYMBOLS is not defined. In that case, there will be build failure. So use CONFIG_SPL_BINMAN_SYMBOLS to guard the macros, and define CONFIG_SPL_BINMAN_SYMBOLS in binman syms test.
I guess they should be CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(BINMAN_SYMBOLS) instead, as there's also a CONFIG_TPL_BINMAN_SYMBOLS.
No. CONFIG_IS_ENABLED not work, because there is no defconfig generated.
Regards, Peng.
Tested-by: Tim Harvey tharvey@gateworks.com #imx8m[m,n,p]-venice Signed-off-by: Peng Fan peng.fan@nxp.com
include/binman_sym.h | 2 +- tools/binman/test/u_boot_binman_syms.c | 1 + tools/binman/test/u_boot_binman_syms_size.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/binman_sym.h b/include/binman_sym.h index 72e6765fe52..548d8f5654c 100644 --- a/include/binman_sym.h +++ b/include/binman_sym.h @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
#define BINMAN_SYM_MISSING (-1UL)
-#ifdef CONFIG_BINMAN +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BINMAN_SYMBOLS
/**
- binman_symname() - Internal function to get a binman symbol name
diff --git a/tools/binman/test/u_boot_binman_syms.c b/tools/binman/test/u_boot_binman_syms.c index 37fc339ce84..f4a4d1f6846 100644 --- a/tools/binman/test/u_boot_binman_syms.c +++ b/tools/binman/test/u_boot_binman_syms.c @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ */
#define CONFIG_BINMAN +#define CONFIG_SPL_BINMAN_SYMBOLS #include <binman_sym.h>
binman_sym_declare(unsigned long, u_boot_spl_any, offset); diff --git a/tools/binman/test/u_boot_binman_syms_size.c b/tools/binman/test/u_boot_binman_syms_size.c index 7224bc1863c..3a01d8ca4be 100644 --- a/tools/binman/test/u_boot_binman_syms_size.c +++ b/tools/binman/test/u_boot_binman_syms_size.c @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ */
#define CONFIG_BINMAN +#define CONFIG_SPL_BINMAN_SYMBOLS #include <binman_sym.h>
binman_sym_declare(char, u_boot_spl, pos);