On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:58:18PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
On 21.7.2016 16:46, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 01:51:20PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 19.7.2016 07:12, Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu wrote:
Move config option CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH as Kconfig option. All the boards which needs to enable this option can be done through defconfigs
Signed-off-by: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu sivadur@xilinx.com
Changes for v2:
- No changes
common/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/common/Kconfig b/common/Kconfig index 8adc821..46e7173 100644 --- a/common/Kconfig +++ b/common/Kconfig @@ -197,3 +197,9 @@ config CONSOLE_RECORD_IN_SIZE tstc() and getc() will use this in preference to real device input. The buffer is allocated immediately after the malloc() region is ready.
+config SYS_NO_FLASH
- bool "Disable support for parallel NOR flash"
- default n
- help
This option is used to disable support for parallel NOR flash.Do you want to take this patch to your tree? Or should I take it to my tree with others patches which remove this option for zynq boards?
Is it blocking other changes? If no, I'll grab it probably post -rc2 and migrate all config files, if yes, um, if we can grab this now and migrate later without adding a ton of warnings, we can go that way.
There are 2 follow up patches which depends on this one.
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-July/260970.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-July/260972.html
The point here that they are removing board files for 4 boards. But if you want to do it after rc2 I am fine with it.
Go ahead and bring it all in your tree (and build a bunch of arm) and if it looks OK there, I'll take it now. Thanks!