This commit modifies the expected result for hush 2021. Indeed, there were bugs in actual U-Boot hush which were fixed in upstream Busybox. As hush 2021 is based on upstream Busybox, these bugs no longer exist.
Signed-off-by: Francis Laniel francis.laniel@amarulasolutions.com --- test/hush/list.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/test/hush/list.c b/test/hush/list.c index 052cf2783c..096bb4f034 100644 --- a/test/hush/list.c +++ b/test/hush/list.c @@ -50,8 +50,32 @@ static int hush_test_and_or(struct unit_test_state *uts) { /* A && B || C truth table. */ ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false && false || false", 0)); +#ifdef CONFIG_HUSH_OLD_PARSER ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false && false || true", 0)); +#elif defined(CONFIG_HUSH_2021_PARSER) + /* + * This difference seems to come from a bug solved in Busybox hush. + * + * Indeed, the following expression can be seen like this: + * (false && false) || true + * So, (false && false) returns 1, the second false is not executed, and + * true is executed because of ||. + */ + ut_assertok(run_command("false && false || true", 0)); +#endif /* CONFIG_HUSH_2021_PARSER */ +#ifdef CONFIG_HUSH_OLD_PARSER ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false && true || true", 0)); +#elif defined(CONFIG_HUSH_2021_PARSER) + /* + * This difference seems to come from a bug solved in Busybox hush. + * + * Indeed, the following expression can be seen like this: + * (false && true) || true + * So, (false && true) returns 1, the true is not executed, and true is + * executed because of ||. + */ + ut_assertok(run_command("false && true || true", 0)); +#endif /* CONFIG_HUSH_2021_PARSER */ ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false && true || false", 0)); ut_assertok(run_command("true && true || false", 0)); ut_asserteq(1, run_command("true && false || false", 0)); @@ -69,8 +93,32 @@ static int hush_test_or_and(struct unit_test_state *uts) ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false || false && true", 0)); ut_assertok(run_command("false || true && true", 0)); ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false || true && false", 0)); +#ifdef CONFIG_HUSH_OLD_PARSER ut_assertok(run_command("true || true && false", 0)); +#elif defined(CONFIG_HUSH_2021_PARSER) + /* + * This difference seems to come from a bug solved in Busybox hush. + * + * Indeed, the following expression can be seen like this: + * (true || true) && false + * So, (true || true) returns 0, the second true is not executed, and + * then false is executed because of &&. + */ + ut_asserteq(1, run_command("true || true && false", 0)); +#endif /* CONFIG_HUSH_2021_PARSER */ +#ifdef CONFIG_HUSH_OLD_PARSER ut_assertok(run_command("true || false && false", 0)); +#elif defined(CONFIG_HUSH_2021_PARSER) + /* + * This difference seems to come from a bug solved in Busybox hush. + * + * Indeed, the following expression can be seen like this: + * (true || false) && false + * So, (true || false) returns 0, the false is not executed, and then + * false is executed because of &&. + */ + ut_asserteq(1, run_command("true || false && false", 0)); +#endif /* CONFIG_HUSH_2021_PARSER */ ut_assertok(run_command("true || false && true", 0)); ut_assertok(run_command("true || true && true", 0));