
5 Dec
2016
5 Dec
'16
11:28 a.m.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Phil Edworthy phil.edworthy@renesas.com wrote:
Hi Jagan,
On 02 December 2016 14:20, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Phil Edworthy phil.edworthy@renesas.com wrote:
This is in preparation for adding another arg.
?? proper reason for changing arg to bool.
Purely because the patch 11 adds another arg that is a bool (which is the natural type as it is read from a dtb). Then having this bypass arg as something other than a bool look a bit odd.
Can't we make this as 11 and saying the reason for bool which is used/compatible with previous dt patch (I mean 11th patch in the current case)?
thanks!
--
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.