Hi, Marek
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 08:29:20PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, July 02, 2015 at 01:02:59 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
Add i.MX6UL pins IOMUX file which defines the IOMUX settings for choose.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan Peng.Fan@freescale.com Signed-off-by: Ye.Li B37916@freescale.com
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h | 2 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6ul_pins.h | 1065 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 1067 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6ul_pins.h
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h index 534f780..4b6bb18 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ enum { #include "mx6sl_pins.h" #elif defined(CONFIG_MX6SX) #include "mx6sx_pins.h" +#elif defined(CONFIG_MX6UL) +#include "mx6ul_pins.h" #else #error "Please select cpu" #endif /* CONFIG_MX6Q */
Would it be possible to build a single image for an entire MX6 lineup of CPUs ? I think it is now possible to build a single image for MX6 Quad/Dual/DualLite/Solo ... do SX and UL integrate well into this too? Seeing this patch, I don't think so ...
A single image you mean like linux kernel, one image cover all the arch/driver code, and using dts to cover board part? If so, agree to build a single image for i.MX6, but dtb is not added now. To kernel, pinmux header are used for dtb, but now we do need this file to set pinmux in uboot board file.
SX and UL have different pinmux from others.
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6ul_pins.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6ul_pins.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c92b4f0
How very different is this from Solo or SoloX ? Is the pinmux map really that different that it needs a new file of it's own (I did not check) ?
SX and UL have different pinmux map.
Best regards, Marek Vasut
Regards, Peng. --