7 Jul
2008
7 Jul
'08
10:41 p.m.
u-boot-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Open question:
- Are CFG_64BIT_LBA and CONFIG_LBA48 kind of redundant? At least it seems that CONFIG_LBA48 requires CFG_64BIT_LBA to be set or we will have problems due to insufficient size of the data
types.
Ok, I see. CFG_64BIT_LBA is somewhat redundant. The 64bit prints are (and sector reads from command line) are protected by different define's Taking off CFG_64BIT_LBA and making the secrtor number always a 64bit should be perfectly fine. And we're quickly approaching the 2.1TB limit a 32bit lba has anyways.