
4 Mar
2004
4 Mar
'04
2:21 p.m.
In message 04030413332001.12732@pcj86 you wrote:
This 'could' be usefull to speed up the i2c communication if there are more than one i2c devices with significant differences between the clock timing; ex. 27C32 (100kHz@3.3V) and LM75 (400kHz). Tolunay has spoken about like this. But right I see now reason to do so, too. U-Boot has to be a boot loader not a performant operator...
Do you think it is legal to clock the I2C bus at 400 kHz when there are devices on the bus that are spec'ed only for 100 kHz? I may be wrong, but such an idea sounds awfully risky to me.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de
"An open mind has but one disadvantage: it collects dirt."
- a saying at RPI