30 Apr
2011
30 Apr
'11
9:26 a.m.
On Friday, April 29, 2011 06:20:36 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Andy Fleming wrote:
It's just that the other way would also be possible. I re-read the thread where this was discussed, and while I definitely agree that the originally proposed solution was highly error-prone, I think *allowing* users to do this is fine:
mmc read <dev>:<part> <addr> <blk> <cnt>
Is there a reason that this wouldn't work with the current model?
Of course it works, but I don't like it:
- I think different user interfaces for the same thing are usually confusing.
and bloatful -mike