Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc86xx: use r4 instead of r2 in lock_ram_in_cache and unlock_ram_in_cache

13 Oct 2008


      Dear Nick Spence,
In message 12199577553905-git-send-email-nick.spence@freescale.com you wrote:
...
This is needed in unlock_ram_in_cache() because it is called from C and
will corrupt the small data area anchor that is kept in R2.
lock_ram_in_cache() is modified similarly as good coding practice, but
is not called from C.
Signed-off-by: Nick Spence nick.spence@freescale.com
cpu/mpc86xx/start.S |    8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
GUIs  are  virtually  useless.  Learn  tools.  They're  configurable,
scriptable, automatable, cron-able, interoperable, etc. We don't need
no brain-dead winslurping monolithic claptrap.
                               -- Tom Christiansen in 371140df@csnews