On 4/22/20 12:50 PM, Arnaud Ferraris wrote:
From: Adrian Ratiu adrian.ratiu@collabora.com
drivers/usb/musb-new/ti-musb.c: In function 'ti_musb_ofdata_to_platdata': drivers/usb/musb-new/ti-musb.c:93:30: warning: comparison between pointer and integer if (platdata->ctrl_mod_base == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE) {}
Signed-off-by: Adrian Ratiu adrian.ratiu@collabora.com Signed-off-by: Arnaud Ferraris arnaud.ferraris@collabora.com
drivers/usb/musb-new/ti-musb.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb-new/ti-musb.c b/drivers/usb/musb-new/ti-musb.c index 4e88652433..0c124a2c5e 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/musb-new/ti-musb.c +++ b/drivers/usb/musb-new/ti-musb.c @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int ti_musb_ofdata_to_platdata(struct udevice *dev) phys = fdtdec_lookup_phandle(fdt, node, "phys"); ctrl_mod = fdtdec_lookup_phandle(fdt, phys, "ti,ctrl_mod"); platdata->ctrl_mod_base = (void *)fdtdec_get_addr(fdt, ctrl_mod, "reg");
- if (platdata->ctrl_mod_base == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE) {
- if (platdata->ctrl_mod_base == (void *)FDT_ADDR_T_NONE) { pr_err("MUSB ctrl mod missing\n");
Is this patching the same code as 1/2 ?