On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
On 15.12.2015 20:51, Joe Hershberger wrote:
Hi Michal,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com wrote:
recv function should return 0 instead of frame_len not to proceed the same packet again in core.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com
Acked-by: Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@ni.com
Oops. NAK. Didn't realize this was the top-level recv function being passed to the eth layer.
I expect that origin ACK was valid and you realized like for other driver that here should be return 0 because separation with free_pkt is done in 3/5.
Yes!
Acked-by: Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@ni.com