On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com wrote:
On 12/20/2011 09:38 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
So, in chasing down another problem I was having (that turned out unrelated) I just made SPL use the full NAND stack. It wouldn't be difficult to add CONFIG_SPL_FULL_NAND_SUPPORT
How about CONFIG_SPL_NAND_FULL?
(and either keep the existing name for nand_spl_simple or rename to CONFIG_SPL_MIN_NAND_SUPPORT).
Please keep it as CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SIMPLE. There will be other NAND SPL implementations besides "simple" and "full" once we migrate over the existing nand_spl users.
OK, I only opened up README.SPL which says CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT and not documenting that existing CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SIMPLE, so, agreed. And I'll add CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SIMPLE to the README.