
15 Oct
2012
15 Oct
'12
9 p.m.
Dear Tom Rini,
In message 507C4E37.8000000@ti.com you wrote:
I will not claim the kernel practice to be 100% consistent, but yes. git am --signoff, git pull/merge and no -s in merge commits seems to be the practice. Perhaps we should stop saying we follow the kernel process, link to it as useful background, but then document what we actually want / do which is only require new S-O-B on code modification, and allow custodians to add their own they want for tracking or otherwise ease of not having to remember a different workflow for kernel vs U-Boot?
I'm fine with that.
We could (should?) also ask the Linux PTBs about their opinion on this (and the observed inconsistency).
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
"Infidels in all ages have battled for the rights of man, and have at
all times been the fearless advocates of liberty and justice."
- Robert Green Ingersoll