Hi Wolfgang,
On 10/30/2012 11:04 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
By extracting these defines into a header, they can be re-used by other C sources as well. This will be done by the SPL framework OS boot support.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de
Changes in v6:
- Fix compile warning: release.S:354:0: warning: "EPAPR_MAGIC" redefined
Please re-read http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-Boot/Patches#Sending_updated_patch_versions
You are supposed to provide a _history_ of changes here, but instead you describe only the latest change. This is not how it's suppoosed to be done.
As you know this patch is part of a patch-series. And this is the first time that this patch has a change. So this summary covers the complete history for this patch.
Also, your submission includes neither any "In-reply-to:" nor any "References:" header, i. e. there is no way to match it to any previous mail thread.
Yes, I should have done this. Sorry.
This is very bad. How are we supposed to know what you are actually talking about, or where we would find any of the previous patches or the other 6 patches of this series?
In this version of the patch series, I only made this small change to this patch 1/7. I wanted to spare the list a resending of the complete patchset for such a small change.
So what is the recommended way to do this? Is it really recommended/required to repost the complete patch series upon a small change in only one patch? No problem, I can do this. patman makes it very easy. :)
Should I repost the complete series again?
Thanks, Stefan