Dear Marek Vasut,
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
I'm unhappy about the image generator ;-)
Ok, now Otavio will probably hate me, but I believe it'd be much more helpful to convert mxsboot into part of mkimage (though this is unrelated to this patch). And maybe even better, study the generation of boot headers and compare it with mx53/mx6q ones, as mx53 ones are supported by imximage and mx28 carries direct predecessor of mx53 bootrom and then try to implement support into imximage part of mkimage.
I agree and it would be better to get rid of it however I also think we ought to focus on finishing the i.MX233 support now before start changing it.
Either we say "i.MX28" - then it's clear we mean a specific FSL SoC, identified by it's product name. Or we say "mxs" like allover the place in the Linux and U-Boot code.
Well, we can also say i.mx233/i.mx28 . MX6Q is supported by mkimage I think (see above).
I have done this change here and queued it for the next pull request. I use MXS on some places and the i.MX233/i.MX28 on the usage message.