On 01/22/2011 01:52 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
seedshope wrote:
Since SDRAM init function have already change, So the SDRAM initial function must be change.
This description sounds somewhat tautological...
Signed-off-by: seedshope bocui107@gmail.com
Your real name is required in the signoff.
board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c b/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c index 35aa40b..1d03b7a 100644 --- a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c +++ b/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c @@ -78,10 +78,18 @@ int board_init(void) return 0; }
-int dram_init(void) +void dram_init_banksize(void) {
- DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
gd->bd->bi_dram[0].start = PHYS_SDRAM_1; gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size = PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE; +}
+int dram_init(void) +{
- gd->ram_size = get_ram_size((long *)CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE,
- PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE);
You can look at the web site(http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot) for the patch, It is inconsistent with your description.
Thanks seedshope
Could you move this last line more to the right?
WBR, Sergei