
Hi Kever,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:37 PM Kever Yang kever.yang@rock-chips.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 04/18/2019 12:32 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Kever,
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 02:21, Kever Yang kever.yang@rock-chips.com wrote:
Rockchip platform suppose to use TPL(run in SRAM) as dram init and SPL(run in DDR SDRAM) as pre-loader, so that the SPL would not be limited by SRAM size. This patch add rk3399-board-tpl.c and its common configs.
So this means that TPL inits SDRAM? That seems strange to me...why have SPL at all, then? What is SPL supported to do on RK3399 platforms?
The model is: TPL's code in SRAM, load by BOOTROM, EL3 mode(armv8) ,and focus at DDR SDRAM init, have code size limit by SRAM; SPL's code in DDR, load by BOOTROM, EL3 mode(armv8), and main feature is:
- parse and load trust, eg, bl31, bl32, op-tee, which need to before U-Boot;
- parse and load firmware for next stage, eg. u-boot, kernel;
U-Boot proper code in DDR, load by SPL, EL2 mode(armv8), full feature;
and we may add features like below for SPL:
- secure verify for u-boot.itb;
- relocate to support bl31 better;
- boot kernel in falcon mode directly from SPL;
- implement usb download mode(rockusb) in case u-boot is broken;
- enable partition support to support A/B system for U-Boot;
- more storage driver support at the same time other than mmc, eg. spi,
nand;
Agreed.
I have tried for similar model to add falcon in rk3288. So the TPL can boot from ROM and SPL can be from boot device sd/emmc/ etc correct?
Jagan.