
28 May
2004
28 May
'04
11:32 p.m.
In message 1085777488.2325.4.camel@baz.sps.mot.com you wrote:
I am planning on working up a new patch for the MPC8540/MPC8560 ADS boards next week. As my previous patch has not yet been applied to the tree, I am wondering if you would rather I:
1) Create a new comprehensive set with all the changes combined into one patch relative to the current top of CVS tree,
or 2) Create an incremental patch that assumes my previous patch has already been applied to the tree?
Both is fine with me (if you go for 1, please let me know exactly which patch(es) to ignore).
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de
Am I your nanny? The kernel is there to support user programs, but
it's a _resource_ handler, not a baby feeder. - Linus Torvalds in
Pine.LNX.3.91.960425074845.22041C-100000@linux.cs.Helsinki.FI