Am 06.08.2014 13:18, schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 06.08.2014 12:44, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
Alexander Holler holler@ahsoftware.de writes:
Am 06.08.2014 08:43, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Alexander,
In message 53DFDC99.2020206@ahsoftware.de you wrote:
At least I've understood it such that nobody still has an objection=20 against the new feature for "env import -t" (-r).
I object if it would be added without maintaining symmetry with "env export".
As explained I don't know how to add symmetry. It's impossible to export text concurrently in both formats.
What is the problem with ignoring \r on input and not writing it on output?
None. Please read the mails before.
And just in case it has become difficult to follow this thread because the subject should have changed to something else, I think what Wolfgang Denk wants is an option to extent "env export" to export the environment to text files with CRLF.
I've made a suggestion here:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-August/185272.html
But as there was no response until now (I'm not impatient, I'm just mentioning it again because I think you've missed about what Wolfgang Denk started to discuss). it's just an assumption from me, I don't have any clue what he means with symmetry in regard to that "-r".
And without any consensus I will not spend the time to write the few lines of source to implement that (I don't need it). As written before, I don't even care much if -r for "env export -t" ends up in mainline U-Boot.
So there is no problem, Wolfgang Denk and I are just discussing if and how to extend "env export". That is at least how I do now understand this thread about the simple patch I've posted some years ago.
Regards,
Alexander Holler