16 Jul
2011
16 Jul
'11
11:13 a.m.
Le 16/07/2011 11:01, Graeme Russ a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On 16/07/11 18:36, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Greame,
Le 15/07/2011 15:08, Graeme Russ a écrit :
Oh dear, it looks like Patchwork does not honour 'in-reply-to'. It has created new patches rather than updating the existing ones :(
I'm not sure patchwork is supposed to honor the in-reply between patch versions. BTBW, is there a rationale or other documentation on the behavior of patchwork somewhere?
I should! - The whole point of me painstakingly getting the in-reply-to correct for each individual patch was so they would track correctly everywhere (inbox, list archive, patchwork). Oh Well
Two out of three ain't bad. :)
Regards,
Graeme
Amicalement,
--
Albert.