On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 02:39:25PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
This code is normally compiled for Tegra, but sandbox can also compile it. We should not use UNIT_TEST as a synonym for SANDBOX, since it is possible to disable UNIT_TEST for sandbox.
Correct the condition.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
include/k210/pll.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/k210/pll.h b/include/k210/pll.h index fd16a89cb203..6dd60b2eb4fc 100644 --- a/include/k210/pll.h +++ b/include/k210/pll.h @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ struct k210_pll_config { u8 od; };
-#ifdef CONFIG_UNIT_TEST +#ifdef CONFIG_SANDBOX TEST_STATIC int k210_pll_calc_config(u32 rate, u32 rate_in, struct k210_pll_config *best); #ifndef nop
Tegra? Do you mean sifive? That's where CLK_K210 stuff is... but it also seems wrong, you can run unit test on real hardware, and this is a test that could (should?) be run on that platform.