On 15 July 2015 at 04:06, Chris Packham judge.packham@gmail.com wrote:
To make it easier to use patman on other projects add a distutils style installer. Now patman can be installed with
cd u-boot/tools/patman && python setup.py install
There are also the usual distutils options for creating source/binary distributions of patman.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham judge.packham@gmail.com
I've been playing with using patman for Linux development and it occurred to me that patman should really be something that lives on my default $PATH.
That's what I do.
It's simple enough to create a distutils configuration that makes this a reality.
One thing that would make sense for this is to make patman a python package to avoid polluting site-packages with generic names like 'test' and 'command'. With a little restructuring it would probably be possible to setup something that works both as an installable package and in-tree as it does today. But before I go down that path I wanted to see if there was a desire for such packaging or do people just add u-boot/tools/patman to their $PATH.
I think it's a good idea, thanks for looking at it.
Thanks, Chris
tools/patman/setup.py | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/patman/setup.py
Acked-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
diff --git a/tools/patman/setup.py b/tools/patman/setup.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d14ac77 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/patman/setup.py @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +# +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ +# +from distutils.core import setup +setup(name='patman',
version='1.0',license='GPL-2.0+',scripts=['patman'],py_modules=['checkpatch', 'command', 'commit', 'cros_subprocess','get_maintainer', 'gitutil', 'patchstream', 'project','series', 'settings', 'terminal', 'test'])-- 2.5.0.rc0