On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 12:48:06PM -0600, Adam Ford wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 12:42 PM Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 02:45:44PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Marcel,
[Adding Tom and Marek]
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 2:40 PM Marcel Ziswiler marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com wrote:
The blocker to getting non-dm-spl-usb support for IMX8M appears to be the base addresses and instead of adding more of them to imx-regs.h we need to get them from DT via of_platdata which nobody has had time to dig into yet.
I was also a little hesitant due to not using DM in SPL might no longer be accepted upstream. What is the stance on this?
My understanding is that there is no requirement to use DM in SPL.
DM isn't required in SPL, no. Are we running in to some size limit here? I see SPL_DM being set in a number of imx8m* platforms is why I ask.
If we try to run SPL_DM_USB we run into serious space issues. Some of us are trying to boot over USB, but the only real way to do it appears to be to not use DM_USB in SPL, but that requires adding some more manual registers.
Ideally, we would use of_platdata, but if that's enabled, it requires a bunch of drivers to be updated, and until that's done, all kinds of stuff break. I think Fabio tried to push a non-DM-USB method, but there was some resistance.
OK. Yes, I would prefer that ideal situation but given the current backlog of imx changes, I understand the hesitation to add still more to the to be merged queue.