Hi Lukasz,
On 10/01/19 10:29, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Hi Stefano,
[snip]
There is a topic I would like to check. Stefan introduces with his patches a DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE that is still missing in your patches. I solved the conflict (not yet pushed to -next) as :
while (!(readl(&ddrmr->cr[80]) & DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE)) udelay(10); writel(DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE, &ddrmr->cr[81]);
#ifdef CONFIG_DDRMC_VF610_CALIBRATION ddrmc_calibration(ddrmr); #endif
But I have no idea if DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE should be done before the calibration of maybe after. Could you help me ?
I've already rebased (DDR calibration code) on top of Stefan's patches:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-dfu.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/testing
The code in question looks like in below link: http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-dfu.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/mach-imx/ddrmc...
ok, thanks - so the DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE is called before calibration. I have already did this by rebasing myself. There is no need you repost, I have merged yours patches into my -next branch.
Regards, Stefano