On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Christian Riesch christian.riesch@omicron.at wrote:
Hi,
On Friday, December 9, 2011, Christian Riesch christian.riesch@omicron.at wrote:
Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch christian.riesch@omicron.at Cc: Heiko Schocher hs@denx.de Cc: Sandeep Paulraj s-paulraj@ti.com Cc: Tom Rini trini@ti.com Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara sudhakar.raj@ti.com
board/davinci/da8xxevm/da850evm.c | 4 +- board/davinci/da8xxevm/u-boot-spl.lds | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ doc/README.davinci | 9 +++ include/configs/da850evm.h | 87
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 board/davinci/da8xxevm/u-boot-spl.lds
Thanks for merging this into ti/next, Tom!
I'd like to submit a similar patch for the da850_am18xxevm board. Before commit 06194b6b65f701a9d6ef2d9b4123c4afe57d8783 both the da850evm and the da850_am18xxevm used the same configuration, and the differences introduced in the commit are rather small. Should I submit a patch that adds the same SPL configuration to the am18xx board config? Or should we create a header file that contains the common parts and include it in both da850evm.h and da850_am18xxevm.h? Or shall we use the Options column in boards.cfg?
I'd like it if you submitted a patch for both boards. On my TODO list is seeing about cleaning up some of the config files for non-omap4/5 (which have a common.h file they start with) in 2012.03.