On 10/02/2015 14:14, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Luca,
On 16/12/2014 09:06, Luca Ellero wrote:
Scheduling the patch for -next it's ok for me. However there are other two points where pio_words number doesn't reflect the pio_words really initiated, one is in mxs_nand_read_buf() and one is in mxs_nand_write_buf(). Each one declares 4 pio_words but only one is initiated. I wonder what we should do in this cases.
You can fix those as well. I recall that all this goop came from the original (2.6.35) GPMI NAND driver, which is likely where all those bugs came from as well.
Thank you!
OK, I will send a patch to fix them.
Do you plan to send a V2 patch for fixing all the issues at once ?
Best regards, Stefano Babic
Hi Stefano, yes, I can send a patch with all the fixes, that's fine. I plan to send it tomorrow. Regards Luca