17 Nov
2014
17 Nov
'14
7:32 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 05:57:43AM +0000, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 17 November 2014 00:46, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:46:20AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Since we scan from left to right looking for the first digit, "i2c0" returns 2 instead of 0 for the alias number. Adjust the code to scan from right to left instead.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
How about i2c10 ? I assume you see where I'm worried about here..
It goes back to the first non-digit, so will produce 10 in this case as expected.
Oh good.
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini trini@ti.com
--
Tom