On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:39:06AM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 10:19, Rob Herring robh+dt@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:01 AM Jassi Brar jaswinder.singh@linaro.org wrote:
I may be wrong, but I see having fwu properties contained within the fwu node is cleaner than having them embedded into existing bindings (potentially different classes in future). So I moved to the current design.
Having all the information related to a device/node in one place is cleaner IMO.
As I said, if u-boot wants private interfaces between the DT and itself, then fine, but that should remain private and be stripped by u-boot. A separate node would certainly be easier for doing that.
Seems we are on the same page(?). Current implementation does exactly that -- we have a separate fwu node containing all the properties it needs.
Well, isn't part of why we're here is that this isn't strictly a U-Boot only thing? My question is can, and then is, this also being used in other projects yet?