In message 1206724722.23627.28.camel@localhost you wrote:
this patch adds the lzma support with the following constraints:
- it doesn't install the LZMA SDK files. I provide the
import_lzma.sh script to import the needs file from a lzma sdk release
Sorry, but I will not accept this.
U-Boot has always been self-contained, and I don't intend to change this.
Running the contained script the directory will be populated with all need files (LzmaTypes.h, LzmaDecode.*). Anyway, I can resubmit the patch including all files. The LZMA SDK is released under LGPL with exceptions but I don't understand if the license is compatible with the u-boot's license. For this reason I omitted the sources from the SDK.
Please make sure that a patch contains all files that belong to it.
Also, please explain what this new code is useful for. So far I don;t see any real-life use cases ?
LMZA performs better than LZ on binary files. I will switch to LZMA to save flash memory space on my appliance. Of course, the LZMA is slower than LZ.
Anyway, if the LZMA SDK license is compatible with U-boot , I think that LZMA should be chosen by firmware developer when the flash memory space is a critical resource.
My 2 Cents,
luigi
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
-- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de "I like your game but we have to change the rules."