On 5/11/2023 11:07 PM, Pavel Löbl wrote:
MMC driver requires request and response frame buffers to be properly aligned for DMA transfers.
Fix already implemented reallocation for request frame and also add realigment for response frame if needed.
Have you met any issues without your patch?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Löbl pavel@loebl.cz
drivers/mmc/rpmb.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/rpmb.c b/drivers/mmc/rpmb.c index b68d98573c..e951f4e9bd 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/rpmb.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/rpmb.c @@ -482,13 +482,14 @@ int mmc_rpmb_route_frames(struct mmc *mmc, void *req, unsigned long reqlen, */ void *rpmb_data = NULL; int ret;
void *rsp_aligned = rsp;
if (reqlen % sizeof(struct s_rpmb) || rsplen % sizeof(struct s_rpmb)) return -EINVAL;
if (!IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)req, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN)) { /* Memory alignment is required by MMC driver */
rpmb_data = malloc(reqlen);
rpmb_data = memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, reqlen);
The mmc driver use ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER, so better align.
Regards, Peng.
if (!rpmb_data) return -ENOMEM;@@ -496,8 +497,20 @@ int mmc_rpmb_route_frames(struct mmc *mmc, void *req, unsigned long reqlen, req = rpmb_data; }
- if (!IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)rsp_aligned, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN)) {
rsp_aligned = memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, rsplen);if (!rsp_aligned)return -ENOMEM;- }
- ret = rpmb_route_frames(mmc, req, reqlen / sizeof(struct s_rpmb),
rsp, rsplen / sizeof(struct s_rpmb));
rsp_aligned, rsplen / sizeof(struct s_rpmb));- if (rsp_aligned != rsp) {
memcpy(rsp, rsp_aligned, rsplen);free(rsp_aligned);- }
- free(rpmb_data); return ret; }