Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1) loop counter.

Hi Richard,

Richard Retanubun wrote:

From 584b5fbd4abfc43f920cc1c329633e03816e28be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun RichardRetanubun@RuggedCom.com Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 18:26:01 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1) loop counter.

Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun RichardRetanubun@RuggedCom.com

Hi TC,

Sorry for the long delay, I got tied up in an integration and sw release process. It turns out that there is only one place that needed changing.

drivers/net/mcfmii.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/mcfmii.c b/drivers/net/mcfmii.c index 4f1c0a0..4acc29e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/mcfmii.c +++ b/drivers/net/mcfmii.c @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ void __mii_init(void) if ((status & linkgood) == linkgood) break;

•           udelay(500);
  

•           udelay(1);
     }
     if (i >= MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP) {
             printf("Link UP timeout\n");
  

-- 1.6.2.1

I'm not sure if this was meant to be applied, but it doesn't...

Applying Subject: [PATCH] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1) loop counter. error: patch failed: drivers/net/mcfmii.c:270 error: drivers/net/mcfmii.c: patch does not apply Patch failed at 0001. When you have resolved this problem run "git-am --resolved". If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git-am --skip".

regards, Ben