
30 Oct
2015
30 Oct
'15
5:51 p.m.
Hi Jagan,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Jagan Teki jteki@openedev.com wrote:
+static int do_spi_protect(int argc, char * const argv[]) +{
int ret = 0;
loff_t start, len;
bool prot = false;
if (argc != 4)
return -1;
if (!str2off(argv[2], &start)) {
puts("start sector is not a valid number\n");
return 1;
}
if (!str2off(argv[3], &len)) {
puts("len is not a valid number\n");
return 1;
}
if (strcmp(argv[1], "lock") == 0)
prot = true;
else if (strcmp(argv[1], "unlock") == 0)
prot = false;
else
Don't we have is_locked command from user? may be we can all this one as well.
Sorry, I did not understand the suggestion here.
Looks like you are happy with patches 1 to 15 of this series.
Could you please apply patches 1 to 15 and then I rework only this last one?