On 20.07.2012 04:32, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Dirk Behme,
[...]
I'm not likely to have any time until after FTF next week.
Any chance that a PPC maintainer can chime in here?
I think WD applied the cache stub patch already. Can you try now please?
Ping ;)
Thanks
Dirk
I just noticed this with latest mainline: Configuring for MPC8569MDS_ATM - Board: MPC8569MDS, Options: ATM make: *** [u-boot] Error 1 powerpc-linux-size: './u-boot': No such file drivers/mmc/libmmc.o: In function `esdhc_setup_data': /home/marex/testing/u-boot.git/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c:193: undefined reference to `flush_dcache_range' drivers/mmc/libmmc.o: In function `check_and_invalidate_dcache_range': /home/marex/testing/u-boot.git/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c:263: undefined reference to `invalidate_dcache_range' make: *** [u-boot] Error 1 Configuring for MPC8569MDS_NAND - Board: MPC8569MDS, Options: NAND make: *** [u-boot] Error 1 powerpc-linux-size: './u-boot': No such file drivers/mmc/libmmc.o: In function `esdhc_setup_data': /home/marex/testing/u-boot.git/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c:193: undefined reference to `flush_dcache_range' drivers/mmc/libmmc.o: In function `check_and_invalidate_dcache_range': /home/marex/testing/u-boot.git/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c:263: undefined reference to `invalidate_dcache_range' make: *** [u-boot] Error 1
Can this be caused by this patch?
Yes, I think so.
Reading the logs, to my understanding the conclusion in
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-May/124036.html
was to "add an empty flush_dcache_range() to the MPC85xx, maybe as weak function".
Then
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-June/126097.html
mentions "WD applied the cache stub patch already".
So do we have this "cache stub patch" somewhere which fixes the issue mentioned above? I'm not sure I've seen it ...
Best regards
Dirk