Hi Tom,
On 30 May 2014 14:41, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
In a few cases the behaviour of both the hush and built-in parsers seems incorrect. One such case was exposed by commit 1992dbf which attempted to execute a simple command using hush and get the correct return value. Further digging exposed the other problems.
Changes in v2:
- Rebase to master
Here is the rebase, but note I have at least one more thing to look at for this release.
Simon Glass (4): Add final result tests for run_command_list() Fix itest mask overflow Fix hush to give the correct return code for a simple command Correct return code from builtin_run_command_list()
common/cli_hush.c | 4 +++- common/cli_simple.c | 2 +- common/cmd_itest.c | 2 +- test/command_ut.c | 5 +++++ 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-- 1.9.1.423.g4596e3a
Regards, Simon