Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4AEC53DB.6050509@free.fr you wrote:
Would a name such as "marvell.h" be more acceptable? This would be
Hm... I expect there will be little chance to see MAarvell IP blocks in non-Marvell SoCs, so this should work indeed. On the other hand, why not chose a name that works for other CPUs / SoCs as well. [So on second thought maybe your "soc.h" was not that bad a name.]
Let's see what others suggest.
consistent with my intent to replace kirkwood references with marvell ones in all non-kirkwood-specific symbols, e.g. kikwood_egiga_initialize would become marvell_egiga_initialize etc.
Do we need this "kirkwood_" or "marvell_" prefix at all? Where e4lse do we expect to see for example "egiga_" show up?
We do not use "intel_e1000_..." or "realtek_rtl8139_..." etc. either,
Just drop that part. Nobody will miss it.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk