
15 Jun
2013
15 Jun
'13
11:10 a.m.
The implementation of gpio_is_valid() has inversed logic, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel.lin@ingics.com --- Hi, I don't have this hardware to test, but current code looks obviously wrong. I'd appreciate if someone can review and test this patch.
Axel drivers/gpio/altera_pio.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/altera_pio.c b/drivers/gpio/altera_pio.c index fb03760..7ab6df8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/altera_pio.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/altera_pio.c @@ -294,6 +294,6 @@ int gpio_is_valid(int number) int gidx = altera_pio_gidx(number);
if (gidx < 0) - return 1; - return 0; + return 0; + return 1; }
--
1.8.1.2