
7 Dec
2009
7 Dec
'09
10:38 p.m.
Dear Daniel Hobi,
In message 1259672755-929-1-git-send-email-daniel.hobi@schmid-telecom.ch you wrote:
Depending on offset, flash size and the number of bad blocks, get_len_incl_bad may return a too small value which may lead to:
- If there are no bad blocks, nand_{read,write}_skip_bad chooses the
bad block aware read/write code. This may hurt performance, but does not have any adverse effects.
- If there are bad blocks, the nand_{read,write}_skip_bad may choose
the bad block unaware read/write code (if len_incl_bad == *length) which leads to corrupted data.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hobi daniel.hobi@schmid-telecom.ch
@Scott: please review @Wolfgang: please consider for 2009.11
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
"Intelligence without character is a dangerous thing." - G. Steinem