Jason Liu wrote:
The patch add header files to support the pin multiplexer of the the Freescale i.MX53 processor.
Signed-off-by:Jason Liu r64343@freescale.com
Hi Jason,
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx53/iomux.h | 193 +++++++++++++++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx53/mx53_pins.h | 359 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 552 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx53/iomux.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx53/iomux.h
As I said for the previous patches, we must avoid to duplicate files. This file must be merged with mx51 counterpart. As I see, the two files have small differences.
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx53/mx53_pins.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx53/mx53_pins.h new file mode 100644
Definitions for mx53 are different as for mx51, so probably it is not possible to merge them in a single structure. But we can have a single file (mx5_pins.h, maybe ?), using #ifdef to set the different pins.
+enum iomux_pins {
- MX53_PIN_GPIO_19 = _MXC_BUILD_GPIO_PIN(3, 5, 1, 0x20, 0x348),
- MX53_PIN_KEY_COL0 = _MXC_BUILD_GPIO_PIN(3, 6, 1, 0x24, 0x34C),
I think the best way should be to get rid of the cpu related names, and use a more general approach. For exammple, we have MX51_PIN_KEY_COL0 defined for the MX51. It should be better to have for example MX5_PIN_KEY_COL0, whose value is different if our target is a MX51 or MX53.
What do you think ?
Best regards, Stefano Babic