On 04/07/2017 04:41 AM, Sumit Garg wrote:
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg sumit.garg@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Udit Agarwal udit.agarwal@nxp.com Tested-by: Vinitha Pillai vinitha.pillai@nxp.com
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/ppa.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/ppa.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/ppa.c index 7f87bb8..d8f1d36 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/ppa.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/ppa.c @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ int ppa_init(void) #ifdef CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST uintptr_t ppa_esbc_hdr = CONFIG_SYS_LS_PPA_ESBC_ADDR;
For MMC and NAND, this CONFIG_SYS_LS_PPA_ESBC_ADDR is actually not used. Shall we move the assignment down to XIP section? The Kconfig should also be updated.
York