7 Jul
2009
7 Jul
'09
10:22 p.m.
On 15:02 Tue 07 Jul , Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this case the code itself is just larger.
Perhaps we should look into using/writing a malloc implementation that takes a space/speed tradeoff more in line with U-boot's requirements (using a simple first-fit linear scan of free blocks, for example) -- and hopefully more readable than dlmalloc?
I nominate those with the tightest space requirements to do this. :-)
I agree it's sound a better plan but I'll take a lot's of time
Best Regards, J.