Hi Bin Thanks for the reply. I'm building for Intel Harrisonville board with Denverton chipset.
Cheers, Chi
-----Original Message----- From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng.cn@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 5:12 AM To: Ding, ChiX chix.ding@intel.com; Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] building u-boot x86 with device tree disabled , still refers to device tree function
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Ding, ChiX chix.ding@intel.com wrote:
Hi there I'm building u-boot as payload for x86 platform. I didn't enable device tree in menuconfig (CONFIG_OF_CONTROL is not set) because I use a board config file coreboot.h. When I built u-boot, it reports error during linking stage : undefined reference to dm_scan_fdt_dev
Which board are you building?
arch/x86/lib/built-in.o:(.u_boot_list_2_uclass_2_lpc+0x8): undefined reference to `dm_scan_fdt_dev' common/built-in.o:(.u_boot_list_2_uclass_2_usb_hub+0x8): undefined reference to `dm_scan_fdt_dev' drivers/built-in.o:(.u_boot_list_2_uclass_2_pch+0x8): undefined reference to `dm_scan_fdt_dev' drivers/pci/built-in.o:(.u_boot_list_2_uclass_2_pci+0x8): undefined reference to `dm_scan_fdt_dev' drivers/spi/built-in.o:(.u_boot_list_2_uclass_2_spi+0x8): undefined reference to `dm_scan_fdt_dev' drivers/usb/host/built-in.o:(.u_boot_list_2_uclass_2_usb+0x8): more undefined references to `dm_scan_fdt_dev' follow Makefile:1189: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
I looked at the code and see arch/x86/lib/lpc-uclass.c refers to a function "dm_scan_fdt_dev " which is defined in drivers/core/root.c and it looks like a device tree function
UCLASS_DRIVER(lpc) = { .id = UCLASS_LPC, .name = "lpc", .post_bind = dm_scan_fdt_dev, };
Because device tree isn't enabled, the function isn't compiled and causes the problem while linking. It's only compiled when the following is true #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_CONTROL) && !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_PLATDATA) If I comment out the line, it would compile and build. But I'm not sure if it's the right way to do it.
Is it normal behavior? I thought that when not enabling device tree, the code shouldn't use device tree function? Can anyone help on this please?
Please refer to README.x86 for how to build U-Boot as the coreboot payload.
Regards, Bin -------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited Registered in Ireland Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.